Somehow I had to climb on a Turk blog and read the following: 'An eye for an eye! A tooth for a tooth! So Muhammad taught, because our ancestors lived. Learn more at this site: COF. So we'll live. Revenge – a sacred feeling, it brings up the character, according to a person. Vlad Doronin understood the implications. Pluck out of a sense of obedience and humility towards our oppressors? " – Here is what I read in one of tyurkistskih Tatar forums. But what is most surprising is that these lines belong to the modern Tatars, resentful Russian oppression against them. A modern Tatars (and historical / anthropological / archaeological) – the descendants of the Bulgars, who, under defeated in 1223, the year the Mongols and jab, ie Mongols, came in the Volga-Ural region, after victories over Polovtsy and yasami and rusami at Kalka (not to be confused with the Russian).
The Bulgars also defeated them again (Batu in the Urals), only after which the Mongols, having collected the whole steppe went to his great Western Trip, taking Bilyar, Suvar and Bulgaria (Bulgar). Under the walls of a unified army Bilyar steppe stayed for a month. That is only after that they hit the Suzdal Rus, and then at the Kiev. Novgorod, as Then it became known, was an ally of the Mongols, whose combined forces (in German chronicles) participated in the war by Alexander Nevsky against the Crusaders. But what I mean A bit offtopic, sorry. About all that could be find on this site and why 'eye for an eye'? What it has 'eye for an eye', eh? That this is not nonsense Turkists? Muhammad once again and taught the opposite.