Had its influence, U.S.A. had passed over governments, for, of certain form, having access what they wanted and that she was and it is essential to its desenvolvimentista progress: mineral resources all the cost. For Simon Bolivar, while the American Latin countries if not to join in alone State politician, will not leave to serve us it the interests dominadores of U.S.A. For Hegel it had determined nations that would lead the others to the way of the freedom, from there the importance of this for the history of the world. But for Galeano it has nations that they had been developed more than others and they start to monopolize the external market and compels the industrialized countries less to serve its wills, mainly, with raw materials. For more information see this site: Dalton Caldwell.
An example was the signed military agreement with the United States, in 1952, that it forbade Brazil to vender raw materials of strategical value? how the iron? to the socialist countries. due to these necessities, had provoked the Brazilian military regimen that all delivered to the iron and the remaining portion to a North American company. The oil continues being the main fuel of the countries that you put in march the world contemporary, a raw material of increasing importance for the chemical industry and the primordial strategical material for the military activities. Galeano affirms that the rich countries earn much more for if giving to the consumiz work it, of what the poor countries in produziz it. Galeano will argue in its workmanship that fits to these underdeveloped countries Latin Americans to nationalize the petroliferous reserves, therefore of the opposite, the taxes left in these producing countries for multinationals, is minimum, small low. Uruguay was the first country that created one state refinery of Latin America, 1931. Eduardo will say that the oil did not only provoke coup d etat in Latin America, more unchained a war, of the Chaco, 1932 the 1935.