But after all, what he would be cimes? We can say that cimes appears where some situation serves as beeper that the reinforcement does not go to be presented. The partner interprets one stimulates as being an acknowledgment that goes to lose the stiffener object and therefore it emits all the operative ones to prevent the loss of stiffener (generally aversivas and aggressive answers shaped by contingencies in the history of life of the person) and the pareados respondents the extinguishing processes that the organism already suffered previously. Ahead of the stimulatons beepers that are described as responsible for the jealousy, many times the person finishes emitting operative as: To make innumerable questions the (o) partner (o); to forbid to leave; to fight; to cry; etc. Situations these that, certainly are aversivas for the other (a) partner (a). In order to try to brighten up the situation, this finishes, without perceiving, strengthening the said behavior ' ' ciumento' ' when saying phrases as: ' ' I you amo' ' , ' ' you are pretty ciumenta' ' , ' ' he does not need if to worry, never would change to you for ningum' ' ; when enumerating the diverse qualities of ' ' ciumento' ' , when offering gifts and/or any other tests of love; as well as taking care of the determination of the jalousie one. In average stated period () the husband () makes a linking between the jalousie behavior and stiffener.
Therefore the possibilities of the jalousie behavior to be kept and to appear more times are very bigger. In this in case that we teach that the more the person will be jalousie, bigger it is the care and affection it receives and therefore lesser it is the possibility of () the partner () abandoning. On the other hand (a) the Husband (a) can be used of the purest esquiva escape/and dissimulate that this all not hearing nothing and ignoring the aggressive and manhoso game of the jalousie one, entering in action the extinguishing process.